Build talk:P/any Supporting Anthem
From PvXwiki
defensive anthem + monk hench = lulz — Skakid9090 06:15, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
- Seriously. This build makes everything so easy. I love it. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚ŞƳŞŌƤ〛 06:16, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
- No, Aegis made things easy lulz :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:17, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
- Believe it or not, Kihm and Morgahn alternate between the two. The synergy here is excellent. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚ŞƳŞŌƤ〛 06:28, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
My heroes don't use GFtE + Vicious, or maintain AR. Tycn 09:11, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
- Why that shouldn't be happening! I'll check it out, because mine were. I'll see if the order of skills can be changed at all. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚ŞƳŞŌƤ〛 09:43, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
- Ok, I fixed it. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚ŞƳŞŌƤ〛 05:12, 27 August 2007 (CEST)
As with the Party Support Para, this build is more for Damage Support. In that case, this build works very well ! Adriaanz 19:39, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
- this is good and all but i prefer the normal party support. a bit more healing ability. but this is a great alternative.
Mizzouman 21:49, 5 September 2007 (CEST)
Why is this Hero only? We need some more player-usable Paragon builds. Stick a general tag on this, imo. — Rapta 
(talk|contribs) 04:32, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- Also, Anthem of Flame > Blazing Spear. It also lets you micro Aggressive outside of battle. — Rapta
(talk|contribs) 04:43, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- Agressive Refrain kind of becomes pointless then. I use primarily caster heroes though, so I load up big on prot and healing and nuke everything with 60AL characters though. Blazing Spear was a necessary for me and from a build standpoint because it requires a complete workaround. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚
〛 04:46, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- Agressive Refrain kind of becomes pointless then. I use primarily caster heroes though, so I load up big on prot and healing and nuke everything with 60AL characters though. Blazing Spear was a necessary for me and from a build standpoint because it requires a complete workaround. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚
- Well, "I use primarily caster heroes though" isn't really an argument. =P — Rapta (talk|contribs) 04:47, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- I make builds for hard mode that are heroes that allow me to pack up on elementalists and just blow the crap out of everything. This is one of those builds. If you'll notice, every single one of my heroes have party support in one way or another. This is just an extension of my "BIG BOOM KABOOM" philosophy of PvE gameplay. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚〛 04:52, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- I make builds for hard mode that are heroes that allow me to pack up on elementalists and just blow the crap out of everything. This is one of those builds. If you'll notice, every single one of my heroes have party support in one way or another. This is just an extension of my "BIG BOOM KABOOM" philosophy of PvE gameplay. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ〚
- Well, "I use primarily caster heroes though" isn't really an argument. =P — Rapta
i run this for defense hehe
me:
| 
| 
| 
| 
|
|
|
|
and hero(oes) with
|
|
|
| 
| 
|
|
|
|
rather than wasting a char slot =P —
Skakid9090 05:02, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- Well, if you want ele heavy teams, you'll probably have 1-2 melee, 4 eles, and 2-3 monks in PvE. That pretty much ends up being... You, Vekk, Zhed, Sosuke, Cynn, Mhenlo, Lina, Talon in EotN? Paras are run for Melee support, since their buffs are much more effective. Without that, this slot is better off with a BiP or a Spirit Spammer. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 05:04, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
mhenlo, prot, and eve henchies got me through all campaigns easily. don't really need more healing than that, having sologon/professor gai helps though. then you can run olias/vekk/zhed and pwn things. —Skakid9090 05:08, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
- /Support. Mhenlo+Eve+Dunkoro(i'm a pussy)+olias+zhed=lvl 20 content? wtf?
Dark0805(
/
) 19:27, 7 September 2007 (CEST)
